AD IN POSts

Collapse

How Women are Drugging You...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Primross
    replied
    Originally posted by Coconut

    Basically meaning, AI already exists, that your being watched on your net searches and we are all poluted by our own toxic waste whirl pool through the things we use etc!
    oh i know this. if i mention something on a date or near a friend (something specific) with my voice then i go on social media an ad will pop up for whatever i was talking about

    Leave a comment:


  • Muestereate
    commented on 's reply
    And the stuff we read. I wrote that during some heavy social media propaganda during our Trump era. though the post was not meant to be political, I did had some political anger at the deceptions

  • Coconut
    replied
    Originally posted by Primross

    You lose me sometimes
    Basically meaning, AI already exists, that your being watched on your net searches and we are all poluted by our own toxic waste whirl pool through the things we use etc!

    Leave a comment:


  • ScentHero
    replied
    Wow!
    I love cops!
    I have diluted mine to 1mcg per drop.

    But sometimes I enjoy putting full dose drops on my face lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Muestereate
    commented on 's reply
    I need to use the quote system better and the jumps, though still broad could at least be worked through with the conversation. I can hardly track that jump myself.

  • Primross
    replied
    Originally posted by Muestereate
    Information engineering, fear aggregation. Artificial Intelligence. They laugh at us you know. They can watch us swarm from server to server like fat carp swarming for breadcrumbs in a lake polluted by our own waste.
    You lose me sometimes

    Leave a comment:


  • XSteveO
    commented on 's reply
    Good times, no worries

  • Muestereate
    replied
    Information engineering, fear aggregation. Artificial Intelligence. They laugh at us you know. They can watch us swarm from server to server like fat carp swarming for breadcrumbs in a lake polluted by our own waste.

    Leave a comment:


  • theLaw
    replied
    Originally posted by Muestereate

    Drama seems to collect sympathizers. We sympathize with what we fear could happen to us. These collected sympathizers hence are filled with their own fears and create a morass of fear worshipers when what is really needed to move forward through life is courage and to band together with people of courage.
    This is what I see with the new "victim" cult that's becoming so popular.

    Instead of erring on the side of personal responsibility, we promote the idea of learned helplessness.

    Almost seems by design.

    Leave a comment:


  • Muestereate
    replied
    Originally posted by theLaw
    For some women in particular, being disagreeable is their most valuable trait. Surrounded by drama, they make sure to never let anyone close emotionally, which only breeds stress and loneliness.
    I've never looked at drama that way but I can see how it would keep people at distance. I myself tend towards being disagreeable, I look at it as a strength and in some ways, not being easily swayed requires strength, it but I can also see it keeping people away.

    This is why I often soften my blends with Betas, so as to be a bit easier going. I don't have to win fights. A very long time ago I learned to respect that others could have their own opinions and I could be at peace anyhow. I just always called it being American, part of living in a democracy is that people are entitled to their opinions. Letting them have them in my mind gives me a right to have my own too whether they like them or not. Respect reciprocates.

    Drama seems to collect sympathizers. We sympathize with what we fear could happen to us. These collected sympathizers hence are filled with their own fears and create a morass of fear worshipers when what is really needed to move forward through life is courage and to band together with people of courage.

    Leave a comment:


  • theLaw
    replied
    Originally posted by Sunny
    I am NOT going by my own personal narrative
    This is what they call in psychology, a belief system.

    What true believers never take into account is that they've surrounded themselves with weak minded people, which by definition can't be trusted. If these people were strong, they would have never agreed to a relationship based on stress or a dominance hierarchy.

    Insecurity is at the base of all power struggles, as healthy secure individuals never feel the need to control or manipulate. It ultimately stems from a fear of being wrong, which is perceived as weakness by the ego.

    For some women in particular, being disagreeable is their most valuable trait. Surrounded by drama, they make sure to never let anyone close emotionally, which only breeds stress and loneliness. However, as a tool for success, it's hard to beat.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	black-mirror.png?quality=90&strip=all&zoom=1&resize=644%2C432&ssl=1.png Views:	1 Size:	124.6 KB ID:	105814






    Leave a comment:


  • Sunny
    replied
    Originally posted by theLaw

    Stalkers are easily created when your brain chooses weak men. There are tons of women who do this everyday without "coupling". Drug addicts have the same uncanny ability to know who's holding without knowing anything about the other person (see Blink by Malcom Gladwell). This is why they say that you're not dealing with a person, but the drug. I would modify this to "not dealing with a person, but their brain." Behaviors are a dead giveaway, as they tell the true story, not someone's personal narrative. Keep in mind that nobody is a villain in their own story, not even the villain.

    Your personal narrative is that these men were fine, but then changed after meeting you. This is easy to say, as there is no way to quantify this claim.......and it inflates your own value (in pickup this is called a demonstration of higher value, and narcissists tend to do it unconsciously).

    If a man agrees to what you call "coupling" then he is, based on his actions, a beta-male. Keep in mind, no woman wants to admit this publicly, as it reflects her own lower value.

    As for your claim that you have an "alpha-male" who does everything you tell him..........if he were, then he wouldn't. You could, however, say that you had a alpha-male, and turned him into a beta-male. But then you run into the lower value problem again.

    People lie constantly. Behaviors, rarely.
    LOL, I never said I coupled with all of them, only 1 or 2. You are under the assumption that every gentleman was "weak." I can assure you that is not the case. Knowing some of their history and who they dealt with before and how they treated them, I can wholeheartedly say, without a shadow of a doubt that YES these men are alphas when I got with them and STILL are. Some of them have actually exhibited narcissistic behavior themselves in relationships past. You do know that people can behave different with one person then the next? I am NOT going by my own personal narrative, I am going by what their own friends/family have said about them. Every man I date has taken me to meet their mother and I've heard it multiple times, specifically about these men "meeting their match." We shall simply have to agree to disagree at this point because without exposing their identities there is no way for me to continue my rebuttal further.

    Honestly if reducing men to groveling simps is one of my superpowers, then I'll take it.

    For the record, I don't need to inflate my own value, my value was high to begin with.

    Leave a comment:


  • Muestereate
    replied
    The psychology of this phenomena intrigues me. I'm not sure I agree with the drugging but when I was young the exposure to copulins made me quite woozy and drugged. The article describes copulins as a hypnotic but hypnotics wear off as does hypnosis.

    Also, are we talking about imprinting? I have a few products and combos that seem to imprint, I think I've been imprinted. I think I remember feeling as if I was the one that had a higher value though I perceived her as a very high value too. In my case, the continued obsession after the pheromones were out of the picture had to do with compound historical, emotional, physical, and recent abandonment. Abandonment does create a very low value at a core level. Much of what theLaw says makes sense or fits in with most of my psychological lense and logical framework.

    If the value framework is valid, Stalkers and imprinting would increase the self percieved value of both parties. I.e a perceived high-value target sees and unveils the high value in the Stalker that the stalker doesn't see themselves. In the absence of the target, the value disappears falling into the hole of a possibly historical abandonment or shame internalizing event.

    The stalker has a hole that yearns to be filled before they are exposed to any coupling, they are predisposed to becoming one, latent.

    Leave a comment:


  • theLaw
    replied
    Originally posted by Sunny

    Honestly speaking I have coupled with a few guys, unintentionally... And I think its somewhat accurate. My female friends always ask what do I do to create "stalkers." Men never want to leave me, and I have had to get restraining orders in the past on 5 guys in 3 different states, men who were otherwise fine while I dated them but turned into lunatics when they could not be around me. I had one guy who lurked in the bushes outside my bedroom window begging to just "see my face" one more time. That guy was a pastor in a church who was usually level-headed.

    My current, an alpha male who I have been trying to let go for the past 3 months, has been crying behind me and doing every single thing I tell him. He was an alpha when I met him, I did NOT use mones on him in the beginning...

    So I think there is some truth to it... And that is all I will say about that.
    Stalkers are easily created when your brain chooses weak men. There are tons of women who do this everyday without "coupling". Drug addicts have the same uncanny ability to know who's holding without knowing anything about the other person (see Blink by Malcom Gladwell). This is why they say that you're not dealing with a person, but the drug. I would modify this to "not dealing with a person, but their brain." Behaviors are a dead giveaway, as they tell the true story, not someone's personal narrative. Keep in mind that nobody is a villain in their own story, not even the villain.

    Your personal narrative is that these men were fine, but then changed after meeting you. This is easy to say, as there is no way to quantify this claim.......and it inflates your own value (in pickup this is called a demonstration of higher value, and narcissists tend to do it unconsciously).

    If a man agrees to what you call "coupling" then he is, based on his actions, a beta-male. Keep in mind, no woman wants to admit this publicly, as it reflects her own lower value.

    As for your claim that you have an "alpha-male" who does everything you tell him..........if he were, then he wouldn't. You could, however, say that you had a alpha-male, and turned him into a beta-male. But then you run into the lower value problem again.

    People lie constantly. Behaviors, rarely.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sunny
    commented on 's reply
    Sorry XSteveO !

  • Sunny
    replied
    Originally posted by theLaw
    Wonder what happened to all those women who f*cked a guy who never called them back, or were dumped by their boyfriend.

    Perhaps all women don't secrete copulins.......or maybe some are more powerful than others.

    Or........maybe there's zero actual scientific evidence to back up the claims of copulins having any control over men.

    Or........maybe it only works from "coupling", where a beta-male is asked to insert himself into a woman for 15min while lying still. Wait.......never-mind.
    Honestly speaking I have coupled with a few guys, unintentionally... And I think its somewhat accurate. My female friends always ask what do I do to create "stalkers." Men never want to leave me, and I have had to get restraining orders in the past on 5 guys in 3 different states, men who were otherwise fine while I dated them but turned into lunatics when they could not be around me. I had one guy who lurked in the bushes outside my bedroom window begging to just "see my face" one more time. That guy was a pastor in a church who was usually level-headed.

    My current, an alpha male who I have been trying to let go for the past 3 months, has been crying behind me and doing every single thing I tell him. He was an alpha when I met him, I did NOT use mones on him in the beginning...

    So I think there is some truth to it... And that is all I will say about that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Primross
    replied
    I live them but don't see an effect on others

    Leave a comment:


  • Muestereate
    replied
    I'd be more inclined to relate any effects to oxytocin. Cops are a learned associative response

    Leave a comment:


  • zeratul
    replied
    Well, mind control maybe a little bit exaggerated and the wordpress source is questionnable. Just my two cents

    Leave a comment:


  • nephil
    replied
    No references in the original blog post... I don't know if I believe the mind control stuff

    Leave a comment:

Ad down

Collapse
Working...