How Women are Drugging You...

[Sunny]

Came across this oldie but goodie and thought to share!
The Chemistry of Copulins (How Women are Drugging You)

The vagina produces a thick fluid known as copulin

1) Change, remove, or insert memories.

2) Tell the male what he sees, hears, feels, smells, tastes.



4) ?Plant trigger words or actions that can cause thoughts, actions, or sensations in the male at later dates (days, weeks, even months).

Through the process of coupling a female and male will lay relatively still without having sex with the penis inside of the vagina. The process may take up to 15 minutes and works faster and more efficiently when the female is on top of the male. During this period the vagina injects up to 1/2 cup (100 ml) of the copulin fluid into the urethral opening at the tip of the penis, which is chemically attracted to semen, and will follow the semen down the shaft directly into the testicles. After 15 minutes of coupling the copulins will have entered the blood stream and traveled from his testicles up into the hypothalamus (a section of the brain that controls hormones) causing the male to become completely influenced by the needs and suggestions of the female.

To read the rest of the article https://constantsupervision.wordpres...vaginal-fluid/

[Ildergreier]

I almost always wear cops. It is just so fun.

[Primross]

As a male I live cops.

[Ildergreier]

As a male I live cops.

You use cops too?

[Primross]

You use cops too?

I have desire me oil. Drop under the nose does wonders

[XSteveO]

Great article. I did have to remove a little bit of the article to maintain the less than 50% copyright laws.

[XSteveO]

I have desire me oil. Drop under the nose does wonders

Yes it does sir. Its like instant swagger

[Sunny]

Sorry XSteveO !

[XSteveO]

Good times, no worries

[Primross]

Yes it does sir. Its like instant swagger

So I guess I'm drugging myself

[theLaw]

Wonder what happened to all those women who f*cked a guy who never called them back, or were dumped by their boyfriend.

Perhaps all women don't secrete copulins.......or maybe some are more powerful than others.

Or........maybe there's zero actual scientific evidence to back up the claims of copulins having any control over men.

Or........maybe it only works from "coupling", where a beta-male is asked to insert himself into a woman for 15min while lying still. Wait.......never-mind.

[nephil]

No references in the original blog post... I don't know if I believe the mind control stuff

[zeratul]

Well, mind control maybe a little bit exaggerated and the wordpress source is questionnable. Just my two cents

[Muestereate]

I'd be more inclined to relate any effects to oxytocin. Cops are a learned associative response

[Primross]

I live them but don't see an effect on others

[Sunny]

Wonder what happened to all those women who f*cked a guy who never called them back, or were dumped by their boyfriend.

Perhaps all women don't secrete copulins.......or maybe some are more powerful than others.

Or........maybe there's zero actual scientific evidence to back up the claims of copulins having any control over men.

Or........maybe it only works from "coupling", where a beta-male is asked to insert himself into a woman for 15min while lying still. Wait.......never-mind.

Honestly speaking I have coupled with a few guys, unintentionally... And I think its somewhat accurate. My female friends always ask what do I do to create "stalkers." Men never want to leave me, and I have had to get restraining orders in the past on 5 guys in 3 different states, men who were otherwise fine while I dated them but turned into lunatics when they could not be around me. I had one guy who lurked in the bushes outside my bedroom window begging to just "see my face" one more time. That guy was a pastor in a church who was usually level-headed.

My current, an alpha male who I have been trying to let go for the past 3 months, has been crying behind me and doing every single thing I tell him. He was an alpha when I met him, I did NOT use mones on him in the beginning...

So I think there is some truth to it... And that is all I will say about that.

[theLaw]

Honestly speaking I have coupled with a few guys, unintentionally... And I think its somewhat accurate. My female friends always ask what do I do to create "stalkers." Men never want to leave me, and I have had to get restraining orders in the past on 5 guys in 3 different states, men who were otherwise fine while I dated them but turned into lunatics when they could not be around me. I had one guy who lurked in the bushes outside my bedroom window begging to just "see my face" one more time. That guy was a pastor in a church who was usually level-headed.

My current, an alpha male who I have been trying to let go for the past 3 months, has been crying behind me and doing every single thing I tell him. He was an alpha when I met him, I did NOT use mones on him in the beginning...

So I think there is some truth to it... And that is all I will say about that.

Stalkers are easily created when your brain chooses weak men. There are tons of women who do this everyday without "coupling". Drug addicts have the same uncanny ability to know who's holding without knowing anything about the other person (see Blink by Malcom Gladwell). This is why they say that you're not dealing with a person, but the drug. I would modify this to "not dealing with a person, but their brain." Behaviors are a dead giveaway, as they tell the true story, not someone's personal narrative. Keep in mind that nobody is a villain in their own story, not even the villain.

Your personal narrative is that these men were fine, but then changed after meeting you. This is easy to say, as there is no way to quantify this claim.......and it inflates your own value (in pickup this is called a demonstration of higher value, and narcissists tend to do it unconsciously).

If a man agrees to what you call "coupling" then he is, based on his actions, a beta-male. Keep in mind, no woman wants to admit this publicly, as it reflects her own lower value.

As for your claim that you have an "alpha-male" who does everything you tell him..........if he were, then he wouldn't. You could, however, say that you had a alpha-male, and turned him into a beta-male. But then you run into the lower value problem again.

People lie constantly. Behaviors, rarely.

[Muestereate]

The psychology of this phenomena intrigues me. I'm not sure I agree with the drugging but when I was young the exposure to copulins made me quite woozy and drugged. The article describes copulins as a hypnotic but hypnotics wear off as does hypnosis.

Also, are we talking about imprinting? I have a few products and combos that seem to imprint, I think I've been imprinted. I think I remember feeling as if I was the one that had a higher value though I perceived her as a very high value too. In my case, the continued obsession after the pheromones were out of the picture had to do with compound historical, emotional, physical, and recent abandonment. Abandonment does create a very low value at a core level. Much of what theLaw says makes sense or fits in with most of my psychological lense and logical framework.

If the value framework is valid, Stalkers and imprinting would increase the self percieved value of both parties. I.e a perceived high-value target sees and unveils the high value in the Stalker that the stalker doesn't see themselves. In the absence of the target, the value disappears falling into the hole of a possibly historical abandonment or shame internalizing event.

The stalker has a hole that yearns to be filled before they are exposed to any coupling, they are predisposed to becoming one, latent.

[Sunny]

Stalkers are easily created when your brain chooses weak men. There are tons of women who do this everyday without "coupling". Drug addicts have the same uncanny ability to know who's holding without knowing anything about the other person (see Blink by Malcom Gladwell). This is why they say that you're not dealing with a person, but the drug. I would modify this to "not dealing with a person, but their brain." Behaviors are a dead giveaway, as they tell the true story, not someone's personal narrative. Keep in mind that nobody is a villain in their own story, not even the villain.

Your personal narrative is that these men were fine, but then changed after meeting you. This is easy to say, as there is no way to quantify this claim.......and it inflates your own value (in pickup this is called a demonstration of higher value, and narcissists tend to do it unconsciously).

If a man agrees to what you call "coupling" then he is, based on his actions, a beta-male. Keep in mind, no woman wants to admit this publicly, as it reflects her own lower value.

As for your claim that you have an "alpha-male" who does everything you tell him..........if he were, then he wouldn't. You could, however, say that you had a alpha-male, and turned him into a beta-male. But then you run into the lower value problem again.

People lie constantly. Behaviors, rarely.

LOL, I never said I coupled with all of them, only 1 or 2. You are under the assumption that every gentleman was "weak." I can assure you that is not the case. Knowing some of their history and who they dealt with before and how they treated them, I can wholeheartedly say, without a shadow of a doubt that YES these men are alphas when I got with them and STILL are. Some of them have actually exhibited narcissistic behavior themselves in relationships past. You do know that people can behave different with one person then the next? I am NOT going by my own personal narrative, I am going by what their own friends/family have said about them. Every man I date has taken me to meet their mother and I've heard it multiple times, specifically about these men "meeting their match." We shall simply have to agree to disagree at this point because without exposing their identities there is no way for me to continue my rebuttal further.

Honestly if reducing men to groveling simps is one of my superpowers, then I'll take it.

For the record, I don't need to inflate my own value, my value was high to begin with.

[theLaw]

I am NOT going by my own personal narrative

This is what they call in psychology, a belief system.

What true believers never take into account is that they've surrounded themselves with weak minded people, which by definition can't be trusted. If these people were strong, they would have never agreed to a relationship based on stress or a dominance hierarchy.

Insecurity is at the base of all power struggles, as healthy secure individuals never feel the need to control or manipulate. It ultimately stems from a fear of being wrong, which is perceived as weakness by the ego.

For some women in particular, being disagreeable is their most valuable trait. Surrounded by drama, they make sure to never let anyone close emotionally, which only breeds stress and loneliness. However, as a tool for success, it's hard to beat.

[Muestereate]

For some women in particular, being disagreeable is their most valuable trait. Surrounded by drama, they make sure to never let anyone close emotionally, which only breeds stress and loneliness.

I've never looked at drama that way but I can see how it would keep people at distance. I myself tend towards being disagreeable, I look at it as a strength and in some ways, not being easily swayed requires strength, it but I can also see it keeping people away.

This is why I often soften my blends with Betas, so as to be a bit easier going. I don't have to win fights. A very long time ago I learned to respect that others could have their own opinions and I could be at peace anyhow. I just always called it being American, part of living in a democracy is that people are entitled to their opinions. Letting them have them in my mind gives me a right to have my own too whether they like them or not. Respect reciprocates.

Drama seems to collect sympathizers. We sympathize with what we fear could happen to us. These collected sympathizers hence are filled with their own fears and create a morass of fear worshipers when what is really needed to move forward through life is courage and to band together with people of courage.

[theLaw]

Drama seems to collect sympathizers. We sympathize with what we fear could happen to us. These collected sympathizers hence are filled with their own fears and create a morass of fear worshipers when what is really needed to move forward through life is courage and to band together with people of courage.

This is what I see with the new "victim" cult that's becoming so popular.

Instead of erring on the side of personal responsibility, we promote the idea of learned helplessness.

Almost seems by design.