So last night I was watching what rare TV I do ever watch, which was COSMOS with Neil DeGrasse Tyson and it was on the paradox of particle entanglement. As I've come to understand and will attempt to example through the simplest of terms: 2 particles, created in the bang/bounce... are connected by spooky physics. They can each go a separate way by billions of light-years and yet their connection is without fault.
Only when one is observed does the pair become untangled/unpaired. The paradox being that this happens quicker than the speed of light, which I believe is explainable because humans are linear, yet the void of space is not. It can be reasoned the big bang created the known universe at speeds faster than light because it expanded into nothing and when there is nothing energy, matter, light... cannot be measured by speed as there are no rules that govern nothing, but I'm getting away from the point.
Somehow the information that is passed from one particle to its pair uses this or another but similar type law, to bypass the regulated speed of light.
So here's where I get a little wonky on the subject. How are they observing two particles at such vast distances? I mean some of these particles are literally billions of years/miles distant from each other. The main point though is how do you know what two particles are doing when not observed? How do you not observe and yet are capable of deciphering data from the nonobservation? Moving onto observational entanglement how do they know the observation causes a break in the entanglement?
I know it can be a little mind-bending but for those who do know about quantum physics, I was hoping for some feedback. I was actually kind of surprised the entanglement ends at observation. That's just bizarre as to how they would actually know this when no longer observing. Maybe that entanglement continues when no longer observed but since we are not observing how is it really possible to know?
This is not to mention the amazing ability to secure networks with entanglement. Our future is just so amazing!:BananaRider:
Only when one is observed does the pair become untangled/unpaired. The paradox being that this happens quicker than the speed of light, which I believe is explainable because humans are linear, yet the void of space is not. It can be reasoned the big bang created the known universe at speeds faster than light because it expanded into nothing and when there is nothing energy, matter, light... cannot be measured by speed as there are no rules that govern nothing, but I'm getting away from the point.
Somehow the information that is passed from one particle to its pair uses this or another but similar type law, to bypass the regulated speed of light.
So here's where I get a little wonky on the subject. How are they observing two particles at such vast distances? I mean some of these particles are literally billions of years/miles distant from each other. The main point though is how do you know what two particles are doing when not observed? How do you not observe and yet are capable of deciphering data from the nonobservation? Moving onto observational entanglement how do they know the observation causes a break in the entanglement?
I know it can be a little mind-bending but for those who do know about quantum physics, I was hoping for some feedback. I was actually kind of surprised the entanglement ends at observation. That's just bizarre as to how they would actually know this when no longer observing. Maybe that entanglement continues when no longer observed but since we are not observing how is it really possible to know?
This is not to mention the amazing ability to secure networks with entanglement. Our future is just so amazing!:BananaRider:
Comment